Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series
Publication Date
2025
Publication Title
Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics
Abstract
This chapter examines the influence of pre-20th century constitutions using a quantitative approach, comparing expert-selected “iconic” constitutions with those identified algorithmically. In prior work, human experts identified four influential constitutions: the U.S. 1791, France 1791, Spain 1812, and France 1848. Here, we employ a genetic algorithm and Document Term Matrix (DTM) analysis to assess which one or four of 180 pre-1899 constitutions had the greatest textual impact on 581 post-1900 constitutions. Two criteria guide the selection: coverage and originality. Through iterative optimization, the algorithm identifies the most textually influential constitutions, allowing for a direct comparison with expert selections. This chapter contributes to both comparative constitutional law and law and economics by evaluating the strengths and limitations of expert judgment versus algorithmic analysis, shedding light on how constitutional ideas are transmitted and potentially uncovering underappreciated sources of constitutional influence.
Number
25-33
Recommended Citation
Ramdas, Tejas; Huang, Patrick Chung-Chia; Garoupa, Nuno; Wells, Martin T.; Chang, Yun-chien; and Ginsburg, Tom, "Algorithmic Selection of Iconic Constitutions" (2025). Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper Series. 25-33.
https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/law_and_economics/1115
