Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics
Title
Publication Date
2018
Publication Title
Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics
Abstract
Many current bankruptcy debates—from critical vendor orders to the Supreme Court’s decision last year in Czyzewski v. Jevic Holding Corporation—begin with bankruptcy’s distributional rules and questions about how much discretion a judge should have in applying them. It is a mistake, however, to focus on distributional questions without first identifying the bankruptcy partition and ensuring it is properly policed. What appear to be distributional disputes are more often debates about the demarcation of the bankruptcy partition and the best way to police it.
Once the dynamics of establishing and policing the bankruptcy partition are taken into account, there is little room for departures from bankruptcy’s distributional rules. There might be a few rare cases in which maximizing the value of the estate requires it, but these inhabit an exceedingly narrow domain so small and so hard to navigate that they are sensibly handled with a per se rule that prohibits them.
Number
848
Recommended Citation
Douglas G. Baird, Anthony Casey & Randal C. Picker, "The Bankruptcy Partition," Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics, No. 848 (2018).
