Publication Date
2009
Publication Title
Michigan Law Review
Abstract
Holmes famously proposed a "no fault" theory of contract law: a contract is an option to perform or pay, and a "breach" is therefore not a wrongful act, but merely triggers the duty to pay liquidated or other damages. I elaborate the Holmesian theory, arguing that fault terminology in contract law, such as "good faith," should be given pragmatic economic interpretations, rather than be conceived of in moral terms. I further argue that contract doctrines should normally be alterable only on the basis of empirical investigations.
Recommended Citation
Richard A. Posner, "Let Us Never Blame a Contract Breaker," 107 Michigan Law Review 1349 (2009).