Reference Check

Authors

William Baude
Dan Epps

Publication Date

1-19-2025

Streaming Media

Abstract

In unpredictable fashion, we record a shockingly timely episode to reflect on the Court's hasty per curiam in the TikTok case. Along the way, we catch up on the shadow docket happenings, manage not to get derailed by an ethics discussion, discover a surprising opinion revision in real time, and break down the Court's opinion  in Royal Canin U. S. A. v. Wullschleger. Most importantly, Dan--with help from loyal listeners--collects on a bet Will unwisely made years ago.

Series Number

5

Episode Number

2

Recommended Citation

Baude, William and Epps, Dan, "Reference Check" (2025). Divided Argument. 24.
https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/divided_argument/24