Mechanical / Animal
Publication Date
6-28-2026
Streaming Media
Abstract
We're in triage mode as the Court clears its end-of-term backlog. We run through the week's opinion dump before focusing on two cases that look unrelated but turn on the same question: when may a state rewrite background property law to limit a constitutional right? In Wolford v. Lopez, the Court strikes down Hawaii's rule requiring a property owner's express consent before a firearm may be carried onto otherwise-public premises. Then to Pung v. Isabella County, a takings case asking whether a homeowner whose property is sold for back taxes is owed only the sale proceeds or full fair-market value. Along the way: a theory about a Landor v. Louisiana flip, the week's run of 6-3 conservative wins, and a short detour into the perils of teaching Federal Courts.
Series Number
6
Episode Number
21
Recommended Citation
Baude, William and Epps, Dan, "Mechanical / Animal" (2026). Divided Argument. 130.
https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/divided_argument/130
