Start Page
1281
Abstract
The treaty process specified in Article II of the Constitution has been dying a slow death for decades, replaced by various forms of “executive agreements.” What is only beginning to be appreciated is the extent to which both treaties and executive agreements are increasingly being overshadowed by another form of international cooperation: nonbinding international agreements. Not only have nonbinding agreements become more prevalent, but many of the most consequential (and often controversial) U.S. international agreements in recent years have been concluded in whole or in significant part as nonbinding agreements. Despite their prevalence and importance, nonbinding agreements have not traditionally been subject to any of the domestic statutory or regulatory requirements that apply to binding agreements. As a result, they have not been centrally monitored or collected within the executive branch, and they have not been systematically reported to Congress or disclosed to the public. Recent legislation addresses this transparency gap to a degree, but substantial gaps remain.
Recommended Citation
Bradley, Curtis A.; Goldsmith, Jack L.; and Hathaway, Oona A.
(2023)
"The Rise of Nonbinding International Agreements: An Empirical, Comparative, and Normative Analysis,"
University of Chicago Law Review: Vol. 90:
Iss.
5, Article 1.
Available at:
https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol90/iss5/1