Publication Date
2012
Publication Title
Public Law & Legal Theory
Abstract
Critical thinkers have used various terms to describe the collective imaginary that has real effects on individuals, society, and politics. Freud used the term "einer Illusion" to characterize religious belief in his work, The Future of an Illusion, though many others in the psychoanalytic tradition would turn to the notion of fantasy. Marx sometimes used the term illusion and he notoriously deployed the optical illusion and the phantasmagoria in his famous discussion of commodity fetishism. (And Marx, of course, is the father of Ideologiekritic). Foucault at times used the language of fantasy and phantasms, in an early period deployed the term illusion, and in later works adamantly rejected the word illusion. (He would always resist the term ideology). What is the difference between an illusion, a fantasy, and ideology? What is the right term to describe these collective imaginaries that have real effects on social and political conditions? In this essay, the first of a triptych, I explore the relation between two of these notions, namely illusions and fantasies, in the concrete context of the myth of the "free market."
Number
378
Recommended Citation
Bernard E. Harcourt, "Fantasies and Illusions: On Liberty, Order and Free Markets" (University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper No. 378, 2012).
Additional Information
Chicago Unbound includes both works in progress and final versions of articles. Please be aware that a more recent version of this article may be available on Chicago Unbound, SSRN or elsewhere.