Start Page
6
Abstract
Anti-sorting – the principle that argues against boundaries that define both religious and political borders – currently rests on two cases decided by the Supreme Court. Professor Samaha traces the history of religious sorting policies and argues that there are two constitutional hooks for anti-sorting: a combination of the First and Fourteenth amendments, which prevent exclusion by local governments.
Recommended Citation
Samaha, Adam M.
(2006)
"Drawing Religious and Political Boundaries: Constitutional Anti-Sorting Principles ,"
The University of Chicago Law School Record: Vol. 52:
No.
2, Article 3.
Available at:
https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/lsr/vol52/iss2/3
COinS