Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics
Publication Date
2014
Publication Title
Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics
Abstract
Financial regulators should use cost-benefit analysis (CBA) to evaluate financial regulations. Finance is an ideal domain for CBA because the direct costs and benefits of financial activity can be easily monetized, and a huge amount of data exists for calculating the relevant valuations. John Coates and others have argued that in fact the valuations are too difficult to determine because of unique features of financial markets that distinguish them from other types of markets where CBA is used. We respond that these features are present in other markets, and that financial valuations are difficult to determine at present only because academic research on them is at an early stage.
Number
683
Recommended Citation
Eric Posner & E. Glen Weyl, "Cost-Benefit Analysis of Financial Regulations: A Response to Criticisms" (Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Working Paper No. 683, 2014).
Additional Information
Chicago Unbound includes both works in progress and final versions of articles. Please be aware that a more recent version of this article may be available on Chicago Unbound, SSRN or elsewhere.