This Article intends to take stock of almost two decades of tumultuous multiplication of judicial institutions, which has led to at least more than a dozen fully functioning international courts and several dozen quasi-judicial, implementation-control and sundry dispute-settlement bodies. The growth has been organic and unplanned. The stated aim of this panoply of bodies and procedures is to ensure that international law is observed and that disputes arising out of its implementation or interpretation are settled peacefully and in an orderly fashion. But one could ask whether, and to what extent, this remarkable growth of bodies and procedures has brought humanity any closer to the attainment of justice, one of the oldest and loftiest goals of human societies.
Romano, Cesare P.R.
"Can You Hear Me Now? The Case for Extending the International Judicial Network,"
Chicago Journal of International Law:
1, Article 12.
Available at: http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol10/iss1/12